GTM Analytics

No. 6 of 30 ยท Product and event analytics

PostHog

Analytics, replay, flags and experiments in one tool, on a free tier most teams never outgrow.

Original abstract illustration in the form of a node graph, drawn for this review
The one fact worth knowing

The company says 97 per cent of its customers use it for free, and the free allowance renews monthly rather than expiring as a trial.

The verdict

PostHog is the most capable product on this list and the one I would reach for building a software product rather than a website. It puts product analytics, session replay, heatmaps, feature flags, experiments, error tracking, surveys and a data warehouse behind one signup, and then gives away a monthly allowance that most teams genuinely never exceed: 1 million events, 5,000 session recordings, 1 million feature flag requests, 100,000 exceptions.

That combination changes what you can do. Shipping a feature behind a flag, measuring its effect on a funnel, watching three recordings of people failing to use it and reading the errors they hit, all without leaving one tool or filing a procurement request, is a materially faster loop than assembling the same thing from four vendors. It is open source and self-hostable, and the API and warehouse story is the best here.

What you actually get

The costs are real and they are the mirror image of everything the top of this list is optimised for. The script is heavy, tens of kilobytes against Absolutely Analytics' 1,270 bytes, and on a content site that is a measurable performance bill for reports you will not read. It sets cookies by default, so in the EU and UK you are back in consent-banner territory and losing the share of visitors who decline. Setup is a real project rather than a paste: events have to be designed, named and instrumented, and a badly modelled event taxonomy is a mess that takes months to unpick.

The usage-based pricing also needs watching. The free tier is genuinely free, but the pricing beyond it is metered across a dozen product lines at once, and the bill for a busy month is harder to predict than a fixed rung on a published ladder. That is a fair trade for what you get. It is simply a different kind of purchase from a $9 subscription.

Best for

Product and engineering teams building software, who want experiments and feature flags in the same tool as their analytics and will use enough of it to justify the weight.

Getting it running

An npm package or a script tag, then the real work: designing an event taxonomy and instrumenting it. Budget days rather than seconds. Autocapture will get you started without instrumentation, at the cost of a noisy event stream you will later have to tidy.

What to watch out for

The script weight is the heaviest on this list outside the enterprise suites, and it is the wrong tool for a marketing site on that basis alone. It sets cookies, so a consent banner is back in scope in the EU and UK. Usage-based billing across many product lines is hard to forecast. The breadth that makes it powerful also makes it easy to half-configure and never trust.

Pricing and practicalities

Free every month, forever: 1M events, 5K replays, 1M flag requests, 100K exceptions, 1,500 survey responses, 10GB logs. Paid usage kicks in above those lines, priced per product. EU and US cloud regions, or self-host the open-source edition. Prices read 2026-09-11.

Who should go elsewhere

Content sites and marketing sites, where the weight and the cookie banner buy you reports nobody will open and Absolutely Analytics or Plausible Analytics answer the real questions in a kilobyte. It is also not for teams who want a bill they can predict to the pound, where Pirsch Analytics publishes a flat number.

How it compares

Against Mixpanel it is broader and cheaper at the bottom, and less refined in its core analysis views. Against Amplitude the comparison is the same shape: PostHog gives you more tools, Amplitude gives you better ones for the specific job of behavioural analysis.

The ten measures

Each measure is scored 0 to 10 and weighted. The overall figure is the weighted mean, and it is relative to the other 29 tools on this list rather than absolute. How this works.

  • Insight quality ×38
  • Privacy architecture ×25
  • Value for money ×29
  • Setup and time to data ×1.55
  • Script weight ×1.53
  • Analytical depth ×110
  • Behaviour tooling ×19
  • Data ownership ×19
  • Accuracy ×16
  • Vendor conduct ×18

What this rests on

Sources

PostHog's own pricing page and free-tier allowance table, read 2026-09-11; its public documentation on autocapture, feature flags, replay and self-hosting; its published statement that 97 per cent of companies use it for free.

Evidence

Desk research against published pricing and documentation, plus the vendor's public demo material. The script-weight judgement is based on the documented bundle contents rather than a measurement I have taken, so treat the weight score as directional.

This is a desk review. I have not been given access by the vendor, I have no commercial relationship with them, and everything above is my opinion rather than a statement of fact. If something here is wrong, tell me and I will correct it.