Absolutely Analytics
A 1,270-byte script, no cookie banner, and a billing policy that does not punish a good week.
Free, independent and comprehensive
A free and comprehensive resource for web marketers choosing analytics tools for their websites. Ten weighted measures, every price read on the same day, no paid placements and no affiliate links.
The thesis
Most sites are over-tooled and under-informed. The best analytics tool for a website is the one that answers three questions, who came, what they read, and whether they stayed, without a consent banner, without a tag manager, and without costing you a tenth of a second of load time.
That is an opinion, and it is the opinion the ranking below encodes. It is stated here rather than buried so that you can disagree with it usefully: if behaviour tooling matters more to you than script weight, the weights on the methodology page tell you exactly which numbers to change and roughly where each tool would land if you did.
Three consequences follow, and all three are deliberate. Heatmap and session replay tools score low overall, because they hand your site a large script and a consent obligation to answer one question. Product analytics platforms score below their reputation, because most of the sites reading this are websites rather than software products. And Google Analytics 4 finishes last, which is the honest result of weighting consent loss, script weight and data ownership at all.
A low rank is not a warning. Every entry here names who should choose it, and several of the tools near the bottom are the right answer to a specific question. Microsoft Clarity is free at any volume and no ranking changes that. Google Analytics 4 is close to mandatory if you buy Google Ads. Read the category pages if you already know what kind of tool you need.
The short answer
Scores are weighted means out of 10, relative to this list only. See the method.
The ranking
Filter by category, or read the category pages for the context behind each group. Showing 30 of 30.
A 1,270-byte script, no cookie banner, and a billing policy that does not punish a good week.
The tool that made simple, cookieless analytics a category, still one of the two best in it.
The cheapest serious cookieless tool here: fifty sites and unlimited seats at six dollars.
The open-source cookieless tool that is genuinely pleasant to self-host.
Fifty sites on one bill and a dashboard you can read in four seconds.
Analytics, replay, flags and experiments in one tool, on a free tier most teams never outgrow.
Open-source cookieless analytics with error tracking and session replay built in.
Eighteen years old, feature for feature a match for Google Analytics, and yours to host.
Free, cookieless, and if your site already sits behind Cloudflare it needs no script at all.
Deliberately tiny, deliberately free, and honest about being neither polished nor ambitious.
Dutch, cookieless, and unusually good at telling you how much traffic everyone else is missing.
Cookieless analytics that also reports the carbon cost of the traffic it is counting.
Analytics that works with JavaScript switched off, because it counts with an image.
Sixteen years of funnel and retention work, and still the clearest way to ask a why question.
The deepest behavioural analysis on the list, with two million events a month for nothing.
Nineteen years of real-time analytics, with heatmaps included at a price nobody else matches.
Enterprise analytics built for organisations whose lawyers read the contract first.
A self-hosted analytics node you can deploy in an evening and forget about.
An experimentation platform with analytics attached, rather than the other way round.
Heatmaps and session recordings at any traffic volume, for nothing, from Microsoft.
Analytics that ship with the deployment, for teams who already live in the Vercel dashboard.
Captures everything automatically, so you can answer questions you had not thought to instrument.
Session replay with the console, the network log and the Redux state attached.
The experience analytics roll-up that now owns Hotjar and Heap.
Session replay for people who want to query sessions rather than watch them.
The tool that taught a generation of marketers what a heatmap was, now inside Contentsquare.
Session replay that treats mobile apps as a first-class citizen rather than an afterthought.
The oldest tool on this list, still counting, still showing you individual visitor logs.
The most powerful analytics on this list, sold the way enterprise software was sold in 2008.
The default nobody chose, free at the point of use and expensive everywhere else.
Head to head
enough on their servers, or everything on yours
Matomo is eighteen years old and does nearly everything Google Analytics does, on your own hardware, for nothing. Plausible is six years old, does.
depth on one site, or fifty sites on one bill
The two best-known names in cookieless analytics, both trading since before the category had a name, both delivering a single clean dashboard with no.
the better tool, against the better default
This is the enterprise decision, and it is unusual on this site because both answers are defensible and the losing one is not obviously worse. Adobe.
the same depth, on very different terms
This is the closest feature-for-feature comparison on the list. Matomo has spent eighteen years being the thing you install when you want Google.
the incumbent, against free at any volume
This comparison used to be straightforward and Microsoft changed it. Hotjar defined the heatmap-and-recording category and was the default purchase.
clarity for everyone, or depth for an analyst
The closest fight on this list. Two mature product analytics platforms, founded three years apart, both with generous free tiers, both with unlimited.
Looking for a way out
More people search for a way out of Google Analytics than for any other analytics question, and the reasons divide neatly into three. The interface.
People look past Plausible for two reasons, and neither is that it is a bad product, because it is not. The first is heatmaps: Plausible does not.
Two things send people looking past Fathom. The first is depth: there are no funnels, segmentation is shallow, there are no heatmaps and no session.
Matomo is the most capable open-source analytics platform there is, and people look for alternatives for one reason far more often than any other.
Hotjar defined this category and three things now send people looking elsewhere. Microsoft Clarity does most of the same work for nothing at any.
Clarity is free at any volume with no session cap, so nobody leaves it over price. They leave for two other reasons. The first is the consent banner.